× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
New Topic  
colleen colleen
wrote...
Valued Member
Posts: 17077
12 years ago
Compare the use of biosensors with traditional methods of determining microbial contamination.
Read 804 times
1 Reply
Sunshine ☀ ☼

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
Valued Member
12 years ago
Traditional methods of detecting microbial contaminants rely on collecting samples containing living microbes and being able to culture them in the laboratory. The need to provide the right growth conditions reduces the sensitivity of such tests. Waiting for the organisms to grow makes traditional methods time consuming.
Biosensors use bacteria or their enzymes to detect small amounts of contaminants in samples. The results are available in minutes rather than hours or days. Detection does not rely on properly anticipating an organism's growth requirements. Biosensors can also be designed to distinguish between closely related organisms, for example, by detecting whether a toxin is present in the sample. Biosensors are faster and more sensitive than traditional methods, and they are potentially more effective in distinguishing truly harmful microbes from their harmless close relatives.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1003 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 188
  
 316
  
 309
Your Opinion