× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
New Topic  
bxnewyork111 bxnewyork111
wrote...
Posts: 1
Rep: 0 0
9 years ago
1.How would you describe and analyze Cesare Beccaria’s overall philosophy of crime and punishment?
2.What holds his arguments together?
3.What are some of his underlying principles and assumptions?
4.What roles, for example, do pleasure and pain, and reason play in his theories?
5.To what extent do his ideas about punishment emerge logically from his own conceptions of human nature and the relationship between the individual and society?
6.What, for Beccaria, is the purpose of punishment?
7.According to Beccaria, crimes are more effectually prevented by the certainty, than the severity of punishment – please comment.
8.What might Beccaria write about contemporary criminal justice if he were to be time transported to the United States?
Read 918 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
9 years ago
For Beccaria, the purpose of punishment is to create a better society, not revenge. Punishment serves to deter others from committing crimes, and to prevent the criminal from repeating his crime.

Beccaria argues that Punishment should be swift since this has the greatest deterrence value. He defends his view about the swiftness of punishment by appealing to the theory of the association of ideas (developed most notably by David Hume and David Hartley). According to associationists, if we know the rules by which the mind connects together two different ideas (such as the ideas of crime and punishment), then we can strengthen their association. For Beccaria when a punishment quickly follows a crime, then the two ideas of "crime" and "punishment" will be more quickly associated in a person's mind. Also, the link between a crime and a punishment is stronger if the punishment is somehow related to the crime. Given the fact that the swiftness of punishment has the greatest impact on deterring others, Beccaria argues that there is no justification for severe punishments. In time we will naturally grow accustomed to increases in severity of punishment, and, thus, the initial increase in severity will lose its effect. There are limits both to how much torment we can endure, and also how much we can inflict.

Beccaria touches on an array of criminal justice practices, recommending reform. For example, he argues that dueling can be eliminated if laws protected a person from insults to his honor. Laws against suicide are ineffective, and thus should be eliminated, leaving punishment of suicide to God. Bounty hunting should not be permitted since it incites people to be immoral and shows a weakness in the government. He argues that laws should be clear in defining crimes so that judges do not interpret the law, but only decide whether a law has been broken. Punishments should be in degree to the severity of the crime. Treason is the worst crime since it harms the social contract. This is followed by violence against a person or his property, and, finally, by public disruption. Crimes against property should be punished by fines. The best ways to prevent crimes are to enact clear and simple laws, reward virtue, and improve education.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1179 People Browsing
 112 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 318
  
 145
  
 81
Your Opinion
Which industry do you think artificial intelligence (AI) will impact the most?
Votes: 352