× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
New Topic  
flyfreegh flyfreegh
wrote...
Posts: 5
Rep: 0 0
11 years ago
A population bottleneck is when an animal or plant population declines extremely low, but makes a rebound in the future (example is the Northern Elephant Seal, or the Cheetah).  We know they cause bad effects such as increased recurrences of gene mutations, and also increased susceptibility to certain diseases due to a weakened immune system, but are they ever beneficial for the population to which they occur?  If so, could you provide an example?  Thanks.
Read 447 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
11 years ago
They possibly could be if the individuals left over are extremely fit and their fit genes do not lead to genetic diseases. Practically, I do not think this ever happens however.
wrote...
11 years ago
The problem with population bottlenecks is the reduction in genetic diversity. When individuals are lost, the alleles they carry are lost forever. If this process occurs enough, the population can suffer. When genetic diversity is reduced, individual alleles that may ordinarily be immediately removed can be increased in frequency. On the other hand, some other positively influential genes can be increased in frequency and can increase the fitness of the population overall. The problem with making a "rebound" in the future is that the genetic diversity is stuck at what it is until evolutionary processes like drift, mutation etc can create new genes or significantly change existing ones. Increased occurrences of gene mutation are not always bad or good for that matter. Many mutations are silent as they do not alter the order of amino acid placement (ie they change the codon to another one that codes for the same amino acid).
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1130 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 1041
  
 214
  
 215
Your Opinion
Who's your favorite biologist?
Votes: 586