× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
o
5
4
m
4
b
4
x
4
a
4
l
4
t
4
S
4
m
3
s
3
New Topic  
urip urip
wrote...
Posts: 3
Rep: 0 0
12 years ago
Hi guys.. I hope you could enlighten me a bit

Is there a method these days for searching a specific DNA in large quantities of material?
Let's say, finding urine traces of a specific person in a small pool or a large pile of sand?


tnx!
Read 2299 times
8 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
12 years ago
finding urine traces of a specific person in a small pool or a large pile of sand

Even if you do find urine, you won't be able to trace any DNA because urine typically doesn't contain cells or any genetic material. That is, unless the person has a medical condition where they urinate blood. The kidney filters out the blood so that only water (including ions, minerals) is excreted.
Biology!
urip Author
wrote...
12 years ago
finding urine traces of a specific person in a small pool or a large pile of sand

Even if you do find urine, you won't be able to trace any DNA because urine typically doesn't contain cells or any genetic material. That is, unless the person has a medical condition where they urinate blood. The kidney filters out the blood so that only water (including ions, minerals) is excreted.

Nice to know... Although while searching around the internet I could find a lot of people claiming urine DOES contain DNA. How likely is it that urine won't practically contain any DNA?

Also, is it the same with feces?
wrote...
Valued Member
12 years ago
finding urine traces of a specific person in a small pool or a large pile of sand

Even if you do find urine, you won't be able to trace any DNA because urine typically doesn't contain cells or any genetic material. That is, unless the person has a medical condition where they urinate blood. The kidney filters out the blood so that only water (including ions, minerals) is excreted.

Nice to know... Although while searching around the internet I could find a lot of people claiming urine DOES contain DNA. How likely is it that urine won't practically contain any DNA?

Also, is it the same with feces?

I think he's right, urine doesn't contain DNA - or it shouldn't. It may contain epithelial cells, which do contain DNA, but this wouldn't be released into urine unless you're sick. Most healthy individuals, however, do not excrete epithelial cells in their urine. Feces is made up of proteins, waste products, and fat from your diet. Technically, you should find DNA from dead cells inside of your digestion system that are excreted as well, but you'd also find cells (DNA) from the things you ingested (the food you ate).
urip Author
wrote...
12 years ago
So if it is that hard to extract DNA from urine and feces, I assume it's right next to impossible if it's mixed and scattered in another matter. Is that correct?

Nevertheless, I'm interested what techniques (if any) is there for finding human cells in large quantities of water/sand/etc. Moreover, is there a way to efficiently find cells containing a specific DNA?
wrote...
12 years ago
Moreover, is there a way to efficiently find cells containing a specific DNA?

You mean like, if the DNA belongs to a human or to a cat, for example. If so, Yes! Specific sequences are found in specific animals, so when you do test a sample of cells, you test it using a concoction of different DNA marker to see which animal it belongs to. However, because all animals, including us, have a similar origin, it's difficult to decipher between closely related animals and the genome of all animals haven't all been sequenced.

I assume it's right next to impossible if it's mixed and scattered in another matter

Yes, because DNA gets damaged quite easily.
Biology!
wrote...
12 years ago
even marked as "solved", I have to write this:I dont know where you get this nonsense that urine doesnt contain DNA. You can DNA profile a person based on urine sample! Although it contains much less DNA molecules (compared to e.g. blood) and urea can be a potent PCR inhibitor. It is also not true that DNA in urine is just in pathological cases.
wrote...
Staff Member
12 years ago
even marked as "solved", I have to write this:I dont know where you get this nonsense that urine doesnt contain DNA. You can DNA profile a person based on urine sample! Although it contains much less DNA molecules (compared to e.g. blood) and urea can be a potent PCR inhibitor. It is also not true that DNA in urine is just in pathological cases.

I sort of agree with Howard. Why would urine contain DNA? If it does, you know the person likely has damaged kidneys.
- Master of Science in Biology
- Bachelor of Science
wrote...
12 years ago
@duddy: it does contain even in healthy individuals (without damaged kidneys)! I am sorry but you are wrong. With no offence, if you are not a DNA expert, please do some research first and then give answers. Speculation (guessing) is not equal to fact.
Urine is not as good as other body fluids for DNA analysis (1ml of blood can contain 1000-40000 times more DNA compared to 1ml urine), but it can be used. Normally a fresh urine is a good candidate for DNA analysis, crime scene urine - it depends (it is affected by environmetal factors, time). Urine samples taken from crime scene (if you find it) can be quite challenging and will probably give you only mtDNA (but not always, sometimes you can get nuclear DNA profile as well or in another case just nothing).
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1098 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 298
  
 9989
  
 237
Your Opinion
Which of the following is the best resource to supplement your studies:
Votes: 249

Previous poll results: What's your favorite coffee beverage?