× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
New Topic  
toni_malvina toni_malvina
wrote...
10 years ago
I keep finding such controversial "facts" all over the Internet on polarity tutorials and VSEPR geometry. Which is right, and why?
(When using arrows to show polarity on a VSEPR diagram, shouldn't the arrowheads of these bonds all be pointing in opposite directions, thus effectively cancelling each other out and making it non-polar? And it is symmetrical, depending on where you place each halogen.)
Read 7585 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
10 years ago
In dichlorodifluoromethane, the fluorine is more electronegative than the chlorine,
So the side of the molecule with both F atoms will have a higher electron density then the side with the two chlorines.
Meaning you've got a polar molecule. not strongly polar, since all four halogen atoms will pull electrons away from the carbon, but the F pulls stronger than the Cl

Thank you for introducing me to valence pair electron pair repulsion.
Just because bond angles are symmetrical, doesn't mean the electron density will be.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1090 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 5717
  
 301
  
 767
Your Opinion
Who's your favorite biologist?
Votes: 586