× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
g
3
3
2
J
2
p
2
m
2
h
2
s
2
r
2
d
2
l
2
a
2
New Topic  
foodjunkie foodjunkie
wrote...
Posts: 20
Rep: 0 0
10 years ago
DNA is universal. But why is it more difficult (or why doesn't it work) to insert a bacterial gene into a human while human genes can easily be inserted into bacteria?
Read 451 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
10 years ago
Bacteria (usually E. coli in labs) can have one plasmid (or more, of course, plus other types of DNA). It's basically circular DNA. We can cut a specific region on a plasmid, because we have its genetic sequence, with a specific enzyme. Then we can attach a gene into the cut area.

Let's say your enzyme targets the sequence GATTACA - when it sees this sequence, it cuts right in the middle, so you have GAT and TACA (and the other strand). Then we attach the corresponding "letters" to the gene of interest (CTA and ATGT) and the ends come together.

Any human gene is huge. Many, many, many letters huge. So your chances of having the sequence such as "GATTACA" are fairly high. The enzyme can therefore randomly cut the middle of a human gene and make it useless. So it's not that we can't, it's just technically challenging.

That said, scientists CAN insert viral DNA into human DNA. Actually, that's how some viruses work (called retroviruses, for instance HIV). Scientists can take those viruses, insert a gene of interest (in the same way as described above), and use the virus' own "technology" to insert it into human DNA (obviously, first they remove the 'bad' virus genes and only leave the 'good' ones).
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1102 People Browsing
 114 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 317
  
 1033
  
 963
Your Opinion
What's your favorite funny biology word?
Votes: 328

Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?