|
Title: In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that ... Post by: Ptelwa on Jan 27, 2018 In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that would not follow its pricing policy (resale price maintenance). The Supreme Court held that:
a. all vertical price fixing subject to a per se rule of illegality b. vertical price restraints would be viewed under a rule of reason c. vertical price restraints injure the ability of sellers to compete so are generally illegal d. vertical price fixing of minimum prices is subject to a per se rule of illegality e. none of the other choices Title: In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that ... Post by: mngf on Jan 27, 2018 Content hidden
|