|
Title: In the case of U.S. v. Baker Hughes, concerning a merger of hardrock hydraulic underground drilling ... Post by: johnsons517 on Jan 27, 2018 In the case of U.S. v. Baker Hughes, concerning a merger of hardrock hydraulic underground drilling rig makers, the court held that the proposed merger:
a. should not be stopped because survival of the industry was important to national security b. should be stopped because the sellers would have over 75 of the market c. should be stopped because buyers had insufficient power to insure competitive prices d. should be stopped because the market was saturated with such firms e. none of the other choices Title: In the case of U.S. v. Baker Hughes, concerning a merger of hardrock hydraulic underground drilling ... Post by: Fvhdan on Jan 27, 2018 Content hidden
|