|
Title: In Lee v. R&K Marine, where a boat that Lee bought became unusable after only three years when ... Post by: Phoebe on Jan 27, 2018 In Lee v. R&K Marine, where a boat that Lee bought became unusable after only three years when it fell apart, and the seller had expressly disclaimed all warranties, the court held:
a. Lee had no case because all the warranties on the boat expired after 2 years b. Lee had no case because boats are one of the types of goods not covered by warranties c. Lee had a case because the defective boat endangered his life d. Lee had a case because the retailer's disclaimer did not meet all the UCC requirements e. none of the other choices are correct Title: In Lee v. R&K Marine, where a boat that Lee bought became unusable after only three years when ... Post by: tdubb1992 on Jan 27, 2018 Content hidden
|