Biology Forums - Study Force

In Lightle v. Real Estate Commission, involving a real estate agent in a dispute over a house sale, the Alaska high court held that the claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against Lightle was justified because:
 a. Lightle wanted to buy the house and so misled other buyers
  b. Lightle failed to tell the sellers that there were offers on the house c. Lightle made racist remarks about the potential buyers
  d. Lightle made a full disclosure that revealed facts that might have affected the recipient's conduct in the transaction in hand.
  e. none of the other choices are correct

Content hidden

In Lightle v. Real Estate Commission, involving a real estate agent in a dispute over a house sale, the Alaska high court held that the claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against Lightle was justified because:
 a. Lightle wanted to buy the house and so misled other buyers
  b. Lightle failed to tell the sellers that there were offers on the house
  c. Lightle made a partial disclosure that failed to reveal facts that might have affected the recipient's conduct in the transaction in hand.
  d. Lightle made a full disclosure that revealed facts that might have affected the recipient's conduct in the transaction in hand.
  e. none of the other choices are correct

c

In Lightle v. Real Estate Commission, involving a real estate agent in a dispute over a house sale, which of the following was not an element of fraudulent misrepresentation noted by the Alaska high court:
 a. misrepresentation of facts b. scienter
  c. intent to cause economic loss by foreseeable persons d. the expectation of reliance by others
  e. justifiable reliance by others on misinformation

c

In Lightle v. Real Estate Commission, involving a real estate agent in a dispute over a house sale, the agent was sued for:
 a. defamation
  b. breach of warranty
  c. negligent misrepresentation d. conversion
  e. none of the other choices

e

In Lightle v. Real Estate Commission, involving a real estate agent in a dispute over a house sale, the agent was sued for:
 a. defamation
  b. warranty breach
  c. fraudulent misrepresentation d. negligent misrepresentation e. none of the other choices

c

In Lightle v. Real Estate Commission, involving a real estate agent in a dispute over a house sale, the Alaska high court held that the claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against Lightle:
 a. failed because Lightle only recommended the purchase of a particular house
  b. failed because Lightle obtained no financial gain from the problem that occurred
  c. failed because the plaintiff is a sophisticated purchaser who could evaluate the situation d. was justified because Lightle used force to make the deal happen
  e. none of the other choices

e

In Lightle v. Real Estate Commission, involving a real estate agent in a dispute over a house sale, the Alaska high court held that the claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against Lightle:
 a. failed because Lightle only recommended the purchase of a particular house
  b. failed because Lightle obtained no financial gain from the problem that occurred
  c. failed because the plaintiff is a sophisticated purchaser who could evaluate the situation d. was justified because Lightle knowingly passed false information
  e. was justified because Lightle used force to make the deal happen

d

:white_check_mark: Marking this solved