|
Title: In New York v. Burger, a junkyard owner claimed that a New York statute permitting warrantless ... Post by: WENLiu on Jan 27, 2018 In New York v. Burger, a junkyard owner claimed that a New York statute permitting warrantless searches of junkyards was a violation of the 4th Amendment. The Supreme Court held that the statute was:
a. constitutional because the Fourth Amendment applies only to real persons, not businesses b. constitutional because to hold otherwise would leave the Commerce Clause meaningless when regulation isclearly necessary c. unconstitutional because it was applied in a discriminatory manner d. an unconstitutional violation of the exclusionary rule e. none of the other choices Title: In New York v. Burger, a junkyard owner claimed that a New York statute permitting warrantless ... Post by: csaenz4 on Jan 27, 2018 Content hidden
|