|
Title: In Spalding v. University of Washington and A.F.S.C.M.E. v. State of Washington, the U.S. Court of ... Post by: ashley0024 on Jan 27, 2018 In Spalding v. University of Washington and A.F.S.C.M.E. v. State of Washington, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that a plaintiff bringing a Gunther-type claim under Title VII must establish the evidence of:
A) validity of job requirement. B) comparable worth. C) disparate treatment. D) disparate impact. Title: In Spalding v. University of Washington and A.F.S.C.M.E. v. State of Washington, the U.S. Court of ... Post by: sophiakhalid12 on Jan 27, 2018 Content hidden
|