|
Title: In Samsonite v. United States, the court found that: Post by: KitKat29 on Jan 28, 2018 In Samsonite v. United States, the court found that:
A) samsonite luggage was causing serious injury to the Canadian luggage market. B) processing of the metal strips was a fabrication, and therefore not qualified for duty-free treatment. C) the processing of the metal strips was a mere assembly and therefore qualified for duty-free treatment. D) samsonite luggage did not cause serious injury to the Mexican luggage industry. Title: In Samsonite v. United States, the court found that: Post by: san205 on Jan 28, 2018 B
Title: In Samsonite v. United States, the court found that: Post by: KitKat29 on Jan 28, 2018 I appreciate what you did here
|