|
Title: Which of the following is an advantage to having less powerful, less centralized Post by: Yoshi on Sep 27, 2014 Which of the following is an advantage to having less powerful, less centralized parties?
A) Fluid and flexible parties may be better able to process demands from a wider range of citizens. B) Mutable party platforms possess greater persuasive abilities over the general public. C) Parties can form a stronger organizational identity based around a single, cohesive ideology. D) Third parties can effectively shoot for power grabs at legislative seats. This is for my political science class. Title: Re: Which of the following is an advantage to having less powerful, less centralized Post by: padre on Oct 4, 2014 Content hidden
Title: Re: Which of the following is an advantage to having less powerful, less centralized Post by: Yoshi on Oct 7, 2014 Muchas gracias!
Appreciate your help tremendously :D Title: Re: Which of the following is an advantage to having less powerful, less centralized Post by: padre on Oct 7, 2014 Just make sure to mark as solved when you get a chance. Good luck with the rest.
|