|
Title: In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), SCOTUS ruled that: Post by: kyrabunga on Feb 13, 2018 In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), SCOTUS ruled that:
a. drivers of automobiles have a reasonable expectation of privacy that protects them from the use of drug-sniffing dogs without a warrant. b. drug-sniffing dogs can only be used if there is reasonable suspicion the driver has narcotics. c. drug-sniffing dog searches are prone to many errors and are so intimidating that officials must have probable cause to use them. d. the use of well-trained drug-sniffing dogs to expose contraband items that would remain hidden in a routine traffic stop does not intrude on a driver's reasonable expectation of privacy, and the Fourth Amendment does not apply. Title: In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), SCOTUS ruled that: Post by: loksing1 on Feb 13, 2018 d
Title: In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), SCOTUS ruled that: Post by: kyrabunga on Feb 13, 2018 Good answer
|