|
Title: In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) the U.S. Supreme Court held that a stop was justified, at least in ... Post by: kljkjkskss on Feb 16, 2018 In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) the U.S. Supreme Court held that a stop was justified, at least in part, by:
a. information from a reliable informant. b. a flyer or bulletin from another jurisdiction. c. the smell of marijuana. d. unprovoked flight upon seeing the police. Title: In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000) the U.S. Supreme Court held that a stop was justified, at least in ... Post by: mikeyp on Feb 16, 2018 Content hidden
|