Biology Forums - Study Force

In U.S. v. White, involving incriminating statements heard by law enforcement because of warrantless electronic eavesdropping of defendant White's coconspirator, the Supreme Court held that:
 
  a. live participant monitoring was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, butelectronic eavesdropping was not.
 b. White had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his conversation with the co-conspirator.
  c. three-party bugging jeopardizes our sense of security and therefore was unreasonable.
  d. the use of government informants in the respondent's home violated the Fourth Amendment.

b