|
Title: Electronic monitoring affords authorities the opportunity to keep close tabson low-level offenders. ... Post by: Jjmcadoo on Feb 19, 2018 Electronic monitoring affords authorities the opportunity to keep close tabson low-level offenders.
a. True b. False Prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures applies only to government agents and officials. Discuss key concepts surrounding private searches, private persons, and third-party origination. What will be an ideal response? Shortly after they first appeared in America in 1771, Blackstone's famousCommentaries on the Laws of __________became a favorite with aspiring lawyers. Fill in the blank(s) with correct word Having multiple researchers from ________________ allows for more knowledge and familiarity with the participants who are studied and the cultural nuances associated with their communication patterns. Fill in the blank(s) with correct word Why are there different state court systems, and what is court unification? Why was unification needed? What will be an ideal response? Title: Electronic monitoring affords authorities the opportunity to keep close tabson low-level offenders. ... Post by: kodama55 on Feb 19, 2018 a
- - - - - - - - - - - - No protection exists under the Fourth Amendment for those searches conducted by third parties acting independently absent all direction and supervision from the government. This issue is increasingly common in the courts as more and more cases are brought to the attention of law enforcement via computer repair technicians, network administrators, and systems analysts.Burdeau v. McDowell and United States v. Pervaz are two cases related to this finding. The Court further ruled that the application of the Fourth Amendment in third-party origination cases hinges on a variety of factors like whether the government was involved in any part of the search, the government's intent and degree of control over the search and the private party, and the extent to which the private party aims to help the government or serve its own interests. - - - - - - - - - - - - England - - - - - - - - - - - - diverse backgrounds - - - - - - - - - - - - State court systems grew at a fast pace, and this caused confusion since many jurisdictions overlapped. Court unification was concerned with simplifying state court structures and centralizing control over state jurisdiction. Consolidation of state's trial courts, granting state supreme court procedural authority, and unifying budgets and state funding were also key elements in the unification process. |