Biology Forums - Study Force

Humanities Legal Studies Topic started by: AnitaSmith on Feb 19, 2018



Title: An expert witness is the only witness who :
Post by: AnitaSmith on Feb 19, 2018
An expert witness is the only witness who
 
  A) Always testifies for the prosecution and Expert Reports
  B) Can give an opinion about what happened without having been there
  C) Always testifies for the defense
  D) Can be deposed out of court



Setting aside due process considerations, confessions obtained by federal law enforcement officers are
 
  A. Controlled exclusively by Miranda v. Arizona (1966 )
  B. Always admissible if given voluntarily
  C. Excluded if the confession is obtained after a defendant is held for an unreasonable period of
  time without being brought before a magistrate
  D. Excluded if the confession is obtained after a defendant is held six hours without being
  brought before a magistrate



The Supreme Court had in different cases given each of the following as a rationale for the Due Process Clause exclusionary rule against involuntary confessions, EXCEPT
 
  A. To ensure that convictions are based on reliable evidence
  B. To elevate the level of police professionalism
  C. To deter improper police conduct
  D. To assure that a defendant's confession is the product of his free and rational choice



Compare and contrast probable cause, reasonable suspicion, and administrative justification.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Studies in England and the United States suggest that approximately 5 of all jury verdicts result in the conviction of innocent defendants.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false


Title: An expert witness is the only witness who :
Post by: elana1980 on Feb 19, 2018
B

- - - - - - - - - - - -

D Corley v. U.S. (2009 )

- - - - - - - - - - - -

B

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Probable cause was formally defined in Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 (1964) as more than bare suspicion; it exists when the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the suspect had committed or was committing an offense.

Reasonable suspicion is justification that falls below probable cause but above a hunch. Reasonable suspicion is a Court-created justification; it is not mentioned in the Fourth Amendment. Reasonable suspicion is necessary for police to engage in stop-and-frisk activities.

Administrative justification is a standard used to support certain regulatory and special needs searches. Created by the Supreme Court, it adopts a balancing approach, weighing the privacy interests of individuals with the interests of society in preserving public safety.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

TRUE


Title: An expert witness is the only witness who :
Post by: AnitaSmith on Feb 19, 2018
Oh my goodness! Your post was awesome!