Biology Forums - Study Force

Humanities Legal Studies Topic started by: buttsuni on Feb 24, 2018



Title: What did the court rule in the 1970 case of In re Winship?
Post by: buttsuni on Feb 24, 2018
What did the court rule in the 1970 case of In re Winship?
 
  A) The constitutional privilege against self-incrimination is as applicable in the case of juveniles as it is with respect to adults.
  B) Juveniles are entitled to proof beyond a reasonable doubt during the adjudication proceedings.
  C) The press may report juvenile court proceedings under certain circumstances.
  D) Juveniles are not entitled to the right of jury trials.



(Question #2) Marxists view the state and the law as the ultimate tools of the ownership class.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



(Question #3) Which juvenile justice evidentiary standard was changed due to the Winship case?
 
  A) beyond a shadow of doubt B) circumstantial evidence
  C) preponderance of evidence D) direct evidence



(Question #4) Marx wrote extensively on crime, which led to the formation of conflict theory.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



(Question #5) The case of Breed v. Jones dealt with the issue of ________.
 
  A) right to a jury trial B) right to notice of charges
  C) right to remain silent D) double jeopardy



(Question #6) Conflict theorists focus on the importance of socioeconomic class, power and authority relationships, and group and cultural conflict.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false


Title: What did the court rule in the 1970 case of In re Winship?
Post by: Kday on Feb 24, 2018
Content hidden


Title: What did the court rule in the 1970 case of In re Winship?
Post by: buttsuni on Feb 24, 2018
Nice!


Title: What did the court rule in the 1970 case of In re Winship?
Post by: Kday on Feb 24, 2018
:-]