|
Title: The Supreme Court held that in high-speed pursuits, officers could be held liable only for activities that: Post by: tarasen57 on Apr 22, 2020 The Supreme Court held that in high-speed pursuits, officers could be held liable only for activities that:
▸ "shock the conscience." ▸ involve police vehicles traveling too fast for existing conditions. ▸ indicate a mere "preponderance of evidence." ▸ show "reckless indifference to life." Title: The Supreme Court held that in high-speed pursuits, officers could be held liable only for activities that: Post by: Omama on Apr 22, 2020 Content hidden
|