|
Title: Mr. Frank, a foreman supervising 43 employees, was asked by his secretary to sign a form requesting ... Post by: lizblackwelder on Jul 29, 2021 Mr. Frank, a foreman supervising 43 employees, was asked by his secretary to sign a form requesting additional supplies needed on the factory floor. He was not careless when he examined the form, but his secretary had cleverly arranged the signature line so that instead of signing a request for supplies, he signed a cheque payable to his secretary. What plea, if any, would be used to defend against her action on the cheque?
▸ non est factum ▸ rectification ▸ illegality of object ▸ mistake ▸ rescission Title: Mr. Frank, a foreman supervising 43 employees, was asked by his secretary to sign a form requesting ... Post by: nchopin95 on Jul 29, 2021 Content hidden
|