Title: Michelle and Deana are arguing about the relative benefits of breastfeeding and bottle feeding. Whic Post by: Sync on Jun 25, 2015 Michelle and Deana are arguing about the relative benefits of breastfeeding and bottle feeding. Which of their arguments is most valid?
a. Michelle’s claim that breastfed babies are ill less often because breast milk has the mother’s antibodies in it. b. Deana’s assertion that bottlefed babies are less likely to have diarrhea and constipation. c. Michelle’s argument that breastfed babies’ psychological development is enhanced. d. Deana’s belief that bottlefed babies make the transition to solid foods more easily. Chapter Title: Re: Michelle and Deana are arguing about the relative benefits of breastfeeding and bottle feeding. Post by: Superion on Jul 22, 2015 Content hidden
Title: Re: Michelle and Deana are arguing about the relative benefits of breastfeeding and bottle feeding. Whic Post by: Sync on Aug 7, 2015 Thank you for your help.
Title: Re: Michelle and Deana are arguing about the relative benefits of breastfeeding and bottle feeding. Whic Post by: Superion on Aug 7, 2015 Mark as solved, don't forget :)
|