Biology Forums - Study Force

Humanities Legal Studies Topic started by: Aviv on Dec 29, 2016



Title: In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court ruled that
Post by: Aviv on Dec 29, 2016
In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court ruled that
A) actual malice must be proven in order to support a claim of libel made by a public figure.
B) false or negligent speech was not protected by the First Amendment.
C) prior restraint was protected by the Constitution.
D) libel and slander were constitutionally protected forms of speech.
E) newspaper reporters must divulge their confidential sources.


Title: Re: In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court ruled that
Post by: Denox on Jan 10, 2017
Content hidden