|
Title: Due to the increasing number of trails involving testimony by behavioral scientists, a professional Post by: Alison79 on Apr 19, 2014 I would appreciate help with this question, thanks! :)
Due to the increasing number of trails involving testimony by behavioral scientists, a professional organization of behavior scientists asked judges, attorneys, jurors, and law enforcement officials to use a 10-point scale to rate the effect of such testimony on trial outcomes. The results are presented in the table below. Use the five steps of hypothesis testing to determine whether the observed differences in effectiveness ratings are statistically significant at the .01 level of significance. Clearly indicate each of the five steps. Calculate the effect size for the study. Explain your results. CATEGORY N M S2 Judges 6 7.00 1.99 Attorneys 6 5.83 1.37 Jurors 6 7.83 1.37 Law Enforcement6 3.00 3.61 Title: Due to the increasing number of trails involving testimony by behavioral scientists, a professional Post by: goji.go on Apr 19, 2014 Content hidden
Title: Due to the increasing number of trails involving testimony by behavioral scientists, a professional Post by: Alison79 on Apr 19, 2014 goji.go...you're my hero. Thanks
Title: Due to the increasing number of trails involving testimony by behavioral scientists, a professional Post by: goji.go on Apr 19, 2014 I try ahah
Title: Due to the increasing number of trails involving testimony by behavioral scientists, a professional Post by: prenan11 on Aug 17, 2014 I am so glad I found this. Truly lost in statistics
Title: Due to the increasing number of trails involving testimony by behavioral scientists, a professional Post by: Twins1234 on Oct 14, 2014 Your help is greatly appreciated.
|