|
Title: In Saadala v. East Brunswick Zoning Board of Adjustment, where Saalada sued the Zoning Board after ... Post by: huck4 on Jan 27, 2018 In Saadala v. East Brunswick Zoning Board of Adjustment, where Saalada sued the Zoning Board after it approved a 7-Eleven's application to extend its non-conforming classification so it could expand its business, the appeals court held that:
a. the Board should not have granted the application because 7-Eleven failed to show special reasons required for approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan b. the Board should have granted the application because 7-Eleven showed the special reasons required for approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan c. the Board should have granted the application because 7-Eleven failed to show special reasons required for approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan d. the Board should not have granted the application because 7-Eleven is too small a corporation to have thespecial reasons to get approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan e. none of the other choices are correct Title: In Saadala v. East Brunswick Zoning Board of Adjustment, where Saalada sued the Zoning Board after ... Post by: sweetpeajezzy on Jan 27, 2018 Content hidden
|