|
Title: Zach Greinke's marginal product as a baseball player would be about the same as a Los Angeles ... Post by: LilyGal on Oct 10, 2019 Zach Greinke's marginal product as a baseball player would be about the same as a Los Angeles Dodger and a Kansas City Royal. Why were the Dodgers willing to pay Greinke a higher salary than he was paid as a Royal? ▸ The owner of the Dodgers was under more pressure from the fans and the Los Angeles media to pay Greinke a higher salary than the Royals were willing to pay. ▸ The Dodgers play more home games than the Royals. As a result, the Dodgers earn more revenue from ticket sales that they can use to pay player salaries. ▸ The Dodgers needed a superstar to attract fans to their games. The Royals had no need to attract fans to their games. ▸ Greinke's marginal revenue product is higher as a Dodger than it was as a Royal. Title: Zach Greinke's marginal product as a baseball player would be about the same as a Los Angeles ... Post by: dnlee1 on Oct 10, 2019 Content hidden
Title: Re: Zach Greinke's marginal product as a baseball player would be about the same as a Los Angeles ... Post by: luigi Manzolillo on Dec 1, 2020 thank you
Title: Re: Zach Greinke's marginal product as a baseball player would be about the same as a Los Angeles ... Post by: Jack ODonnell on Dec 5, 2020 thank you
|