Biology Forums - Study Force

Students must answer ALL four questions. Answers to EACH question should be roughly 250 words in length.
Answers should be based on the course text and lectures only.

SECTION A: Students will complete all FOUR questions. Each answer should be approximately 250 words in length.
 
1. Discuss two of the problems natural law theory attempts to solve. Do you think it is successful in doing so?

2)  Shafer-Landau argues that “contradictions are a fatal flaw in any theory” and proceeds to rework virtue ethics so as to account for the contradictions to which it may give rise. Do you think contradiction is a fatal flaw to moral theory? And is there a way of understanding virtue ethics particularly that calls that assumption into question?
 
3). Explain Kant’s principle of humanity. Do you think the current world is more Kantian or Utilitarian? Be sure to give reasons in support of your answer.
 
4). Describe the atheist argument against the idea that there are objective moral judgements.

Textbook - Shafer-Landau, R. (2019). A concise introduction to ethics. Oxford University Press

Normal Law Theory might be held and accomplished to human way of behaving by means of method of every theists and nonbelievers. The nonbeliever utilizes reason to figure out the jail rules overseeing home grown occasions and applies them to contemplating human development. Activities as per such natural regulation are ethically right. Those that avoid in contest to such normal legitimate rules are ethically inaccurate.

For the theists there might be a divinity that made all of nature and made the lawful offense hints as appropriately thus submission to the ones criminal tips and the enhancement to the ones jail tips provided with the asset of way of the god is the ethically precise thing to do.

For agnostics there might be in any case the insight that individuals have thinking usefulness and with it the laws of nature are perceivable. For agnostics who get this way to deal with act consistent with the criminal proposals of nature is the ethically exact detail to do.

One of the issues for home grown guideline idea is that people have deciphered nature in a totally special way? Should this be the situation if as stated by means of home grown regulation statute, the moral guideline of human instinct is comprehensible through natural human intention?