|
Title: When might a researcher legitimately avoid the process of getting informed consent in a naturalistic Post by: Cremeux on Feb 24, 2015 When might a researcher legitimately avoid the process of getting informed consent in a naturalistic study?
A) When the study is so innocuous that there is no risk of harm. B) When the study focuses on public behavior that could be observed by anyone, so that participants would have no expectation of privacy. C) When the IRB has reviewed the proposal and agreed that informed consent is not necessary. D) All of the above Title: Re: When might a researcher legitimately avoid the process of getting informed consent in a naturali Post by: stylez on Mar 5, 2015 Content hidden
Title: Re: When might a researcher legitimately avoid the process of getting informed consent in a naturalistic Post by: Cremeux on Mar 7, 2015 Will mark your answer as best, thanks again.
Title: Re: When might a researcher legitimately avoid the process of getting informed consent in a naturalistic Post by: stylez on Mar 7, 2015 My rule as a member here is to only answer if I know 100%, so I'm glad it worked!
|