|
Title: Consider the following:Premise 1: If an animal barks, it is a dog.Premise 2: A snail barks.The con Post by: Sync on Jun 25, 2015 Consider the following:
Premise 1: If an animal barks, it is a dog. Premise 2: A snail barks. The concrete operational child would fail to draw the conclusion that “a snail is a dog” because his or her conclusions are based on a. tertiary circular reactions. c. deductive reasoning. b. experience. d. egocentrism. Chapter Title: Re: Consider the following:Premise 1: If an animal barks, it is a dog.Premise 2: A snail barks.The Post by: Superion on Jul 22, 2015 Content hidden
Title: Re: Consider the following:Premise 1: If an animal barks, it is a dog.Premise 2: A snail barks.The con Post by: Sync on Aug 7, 2015 Thank you for your help.
Title: Re: Consider the following:Premise 1: If an animal barks, it is a dog.Premise 2: A snail barks.The con Post by: Superion on Aug 7, 2015 You're welcome.
Thumbs up are appreciated :) Title: Re: Consider the following:Premise 1: If an animal barks, it is a dog.Premise 2: A snail barks.The ... Post by: Sam Pogue on Oct 8, 2020 thank you
|