|
Title: Having freckles is a dominant characteristic. Using a punnett square and assuming typical genetic results, can Post by: rjlene on Sep 7, 2012 two parents who do not have freckles (ff) have a child with freckles?
Title: Having freckles is a dominant characteristic. Using a punnett square and assuming typical genetic results, can Post by: rkkovach on Sep 7, 2012 If freckles run in the family then yes.It may go back generations.
Title: Having freckles is a dominant characteristic. Using a punnett square and assuming typical genetic results, can Post by: ilikepoop on Sep 7, 2012 ummmm im not sure. sorry but if freckles is the dominating gene then if u have freckles for you to have been given them by your parents measn one or both would have freckles.
Title: Having freckles is a dominant characteristic. Using a punnett square and assuming typical genetic results, can Post by: rkoch on Sep 7, 2012 If their is no F (as opposed to f) allel it should be impossible for a child to have freckles.
P-ff-ff ff-ff-ff ff-ff-ff p for placeholder Title: Having freckles is a dominant characteristic. Using a punnett square and assuming typical genetic results, can Post by: mike279766 on Sep 7, 2012 I don't think so...
because when you work out the punnett square there are no chances of that child getting freckles because it's a dominant trait(FF) Title: Having freckles is a dominant characteristic. Using a punnett square and assuming typical genetic results, can Post by: ilapple on Sep 7, 2012 I am not sure if freckle is a dominant characteristic. But if having freckle is dominant, two parent who do not have freckles ( they do not have genes for freckles) should not have any child with freckles.
|