Biology Forums - Study Force

Humanities Legal Studies Topic started by: LovingtoLearn on Mar 2, 2016



Title: The chief significance of the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. California (
Post by: LovingtoLearn on Mar 2, 2016
The chief significance of the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. California (1973) was that the Court ____.

a. held for the first time that obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment

b. held that obscenity directed to adults was entitled to First Amendment protection

c. adopted the standard of "utterly without redeeming social importance" as a test for determining what is obscene

d. redefined "obscenity" and suggested that local juries could base their judgments on local and not national standards


Title: Re: The chief significance of the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. California (
Post by: bolbol on Jul 9, 2021
Content hidden