|
Title: In 2006, the European Union (EU) threatened to ban imports of long-grain rice because traces of ... Post by: vellojo on Oct 25, 2016 In 2006, the European Union (EU) threatened to ban imports of long-grain rice because traces of genetically modified rice were found mixed in to commercial supplies. Instead of a complete ban, suppose the EU placed a tariff on the import of long-grain rice. Which of the following would be an outcome of this tariff?
A) The price of long-grain rice in the EU would be lower with a tariff than if rice imports were completely banned, but higher than with free trade B) The price of long-grain rice in the EU would be higher with a tariff than if rice imports were completely banned, but lower than with free trade C) The price of long-grain rice in the EU would be lower with a tariff than if rice imports were completely banned, but lower than with free trade D) The price of long-grain rice in the EU would be higher with a tariff than if rice imports were completely banned Title: Re: In 2006, the European Union (EU) threatened to ban imports of long-grain rice because traces of ... Post by: ukrania on Oct 25, 2016 Content hidden
Title: Re: In 2006, the European Union (EU) threatened to ban imports of long-grain rice because traces of ... Post by: vellojo on Dec 2, 2016 Thank you for this
Comes at the right time too! Good luck on your exams Title: Re: In 2006, the European Union (EU) threatened to ban imports of long-grain rice because traces of ... Post by: ukrania on Dec 5, 2016 Happy to help :)
Title: Re: In 2006, the European Union (EU) threatened to ban imports of long-grain rice because traces of ... Post by: Vun Montanio on Jan 19, 2021 thank you
|