|
Title: Sarah has a house valued at $200,000 and insured for $180,000. It is totally destroyed by fire, due ... Post by: medulla on Jun 2, 2017 Sarah has a house valued at $200,000 and insured for $180,000. It is totally destroyed by fire, due to the negligence of Courtney. Sarah recovers $180,000 from her insurer, which then subrogates against Courtney. Suppose the courts decide that Courtney must pay $100,000 in damages, because that's all the money she has. How much of this $100,000 can the insurer keep, assuming that the policy has no special provision regarding the distribution of subrogation amounts?
A) $0 (The entire $100,000 must be passed on to Sarah) B) $20,000 (Sarah gets the other $80,000) C) $80,000 (Sarah gets the other $20,000) D) $100,000 (Sarah will get no additional funds) Title: Re: Sarah has a house valued at $200,000 and insured for $180,000. It is totally destroyed by fire, ... Post by: giddu on Jun 2, 2017 Content hidden
Title: Re: Sarah has a house valued at $200,000 and insured for $180,000. It is totally destroyed by fire, ... Post by: ahdail99 on Apr 13, 2020 thanks
|