Business

As the Supreme Court has explained, for a state to have jurisdiction over an out-of-state business ...

As the Supreme Court has explained, for a state to have jurisdiction over an out-of-state business ...

As the Supreme Court has explained, for a state to have jurisdiction over an out-of-state business there must exist:
 a. significant business relationships b. physical contacts
  c. minimum contacts d. substantial contacts
  e. none o

skebart   45   1 Reply

trxozandeniz

As the Supreme Court has explained, for a state to have jurisdiction over an out-of-state business ...

As the Supreme Court has explained, for a state to have jurisdiction over an out-of-state business ...

As the Supreme Court has explained, for a state to have jurisdiction over an out-of-state business there must exist:
 a. significant business relationships b. a direct physical relationships
  c. substantial business contacts
  d. int

swhite9946   33   1 Reply

Techflow21

In Blimka v. My Web Wholesalers an Idaho resident, Blimka, ordered a large quantity of jeans from My ...

In Blimka v. My Web Wholesalers an Idaho resident, Blimka, ordered a large quantity of jeans from My ...

In Blimka v. My Web Wholesalers an Idaho resident, Blimka, ordered a large quantity of jeans from My Web, a Maine company that advertised its goods on the Internet. When a dispute arose over the quality of the jeans, Blimka sued My Web in Idaho state

tnvalerio   21   1 Reply

Mmm23

An Idaho resident bought a large quantity of jeans over the Internet from a Maine company. When a ...

An Idaho resident bought a large quantity of jeans over the Internet from a Maine company. When a ...

An Idaho resident bought a large quantity of jeans over the Internet from a Maine company. When a dispute over the quality of the product arose, the Idaho resident sued the Maine company in Idaho state court. When the Maine company protested, the sup

waleska20   31   1 Reply

nic

Explain the term workweek.

Explain the term workweek.

Explain the term workweek.

Blizzen   22   1 Reply

snp21

Who are exempted employees under the Fair Labor Standard Act?

Who are exempted employees under the Fair Labor Standard Act?

Who are exempted employees under the Fair Labor Standard Act?

jreichert1033   27   1 Reply

kimmaz

In rem jurisdiction gives state courts jurisdiction to:

In rem jurisdiction gives state courts jurisdiction to:

In rem jurisdiction gives state courts jurisdiction to:
 a. resolve disputes over property located in their state
  b. resolve disputes over property owned by its residents, but located in another state c. resolve disputes over property ow

waleska20   51   1 Reply

tiss9889

What was impact of the first federal law against child labor?

What was impact of the first federal law against child labor?

What was impact of the first federal law against child labor?

soccer97   21   1 Reply

cdbaker97

In rem jurisdiction gives state courts jurisdiction to:

In rem jurisdiction gives state courts jurisdiction to:

In rem jurisdiction gives state courts jurisdiction to:
 a. resolve disputes over property located in a neighboring state
  b. resolve disputes over property owned by its residents, but located in another state c. resolve disputes over pro

Vaneisha07   60   1 Reply

ruff

Which kind of property could not be subject to in rem jurisdiction?

Which kind of property could not be subject to in rem jurisdiction?

Which kind of property could not be subject to in rem jurisdiction?
 a. real estate
  b. an automobile
  c. stock or bonds issued by a company d. furniture
  e. all of the other choices could be subject to in rem jurisdiction

ahlea1   23   2 Replies

ahlea1

Does the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) prohibit all child labor?

Does the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) prohibit all child labor?

Does the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) prohibit all child labor?

Alansgirl   51   1 Reply

lmcdon20

In rem jurisdiction can include jurisdiction over:

In rem jurisdiction can include jurisdiction over:

In rem jurisdiction can include jurisdiction over:
 a. intangible property (such as a bank account) b. tangible (real) property
  c. shares of stock in a company d. a house
  e. any of the other choices could be correct

belleej   25   1 Reply

sweetpeajezzy

How is the Fair Labor Standard Act (FLSA) enforced?

How is the Fair Labor Standard Act (FLSA) enforced?

How is the Fair Labor Standard Act (FLSA) enforced?

ruthayak   47   1 Reply

nic

Briefly describe the origin and purpose of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

Briefly describe the origin and purpose of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

Briefly describe the origin and purpose of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

huck4   57   1 Reply

Steph7912

Explain the concept of overtime pay under the FLSA.

Explain the concept of overtime pay under the FLSA.

Explain the concept of overtime pay under the FLSA.

helpmepleaseee   23   1 Reply

Jaspreet

Which of the following would NOT be subject to in rem jurisdiction:

Which of the following would NOT be subject to in rem jurisdiction:

Which of the following would NOT be subject to in rem jurisdiction:
 a. a bank account b. a house
  c. a field
  d. shares of stock in a company
  e. all of the other choices would be subject to in rem jurisdiction

Ptelwa   25   1 Reply

suarezs1

Which are the categories of child labor exempted from the category of oppressive child labor under ...

Which are the categories of child labor exempted from the category of oppressive child labor under ...

Which are the categories of child labor exempted from the category of oppressive child labor under the Fair Labor Standards Act?

nespinal   65   1 Reply

kadodd

Because of in rem jurisdiction, if Illinois resident Andy sues Alabama resident Carol over a ...

Because of in rem jurisdiction, if Illinois resident Andy sues Alabama resident Carol over a ...

Because of in rem jurisdiction, if Illinois resident Andy sues Alabama resident Carol over a Illinois property dispute and Carol refuses to respond, the Illinois court may:
 a. not decide who the rightful owner is because it lacks personal juri

Mimicri   34   1 Reply

freemember

What remedies can an employee seek under the Fair Labor Standards Act?

What remedies can an employee seek under the Fair Labor Standards Act?

What remedies can an employee seek under the Fair Labor Standards Act?

mvillekid20   41   1 Reply

hahauebf

When a federal court has exclusive jurisdiction over a matter:

When a federal court has exclusive jurisdiction over a matter:

When a federal court has exclusive jurisdiction over a matter:
 a. state courts may try cases on that matter
  b. state courts may try cases on that matter if they pay the federal court a fee c. state courts may not try cases on that matte

Ptelwa   26   1 Reply

krothba

When a federal court has exclusive jurisdiction over a matter:

When a federal court has exclusive jurisdiction over a matter:

When a federal court has exclusive jurisdiction over a matter:
 a. state courts may try cases on that matter
  b. state courts may try cases on that matter if they pay the federal court a fee c. state courts may not try cases on that matte

WENLiu   45   1 Reply

Yatesm

In this situation, which court system has jurisdiction? The plaintiff lives in State A; the ...

In this situation, which court system has jurisdiction? The plaintiff lives in State A; the ...

In this situation, which court system has jurisdiction? The plaintiff lives in State A; the defendant lives in State B; the dispute over 35,000 involves a matter of state law:
 a. federal court b. state court
  c. federal or state court d.

musicall   13   1 Reply

Czarnicholas

State courts may have jurisdiction in which of the following situations?

State courts may have jurisdiction in which of the following situations?

State courts may have jurisdiction in which of the following situations?
 a. plaintiff and defendant live in different states, the matter involves state law, and the amount in controversy is less than 75,000
  b. plaintiff and defendant li

kd300x   16   1 Reply

Techflow21

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:
 a. federal crimes b. bankruptcy
  c. patents
  d. copyrights
  e. all of the other choices are correct

EdJones95   42   1 Reply

aaaime

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:
 a. matters controlled by the state government b. adoption
  c. divorce
  d. all of the other specific choices are correct
  e. none of the other specific choices a

Nunizworld   48   1 Reply

gbrossard

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:
 a. divorce b. adoption c. patents
  d. all of the other specific choices are correct
  e. none of the other specific choices are correct

WENLiu   47   1 Reply

ktrobek

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:

Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving:
 a. divorce b. adoption
  c. federal crimes
  d. all of the other specific choices are correct
  e. none of the other specific choices are correct

IRAM   41   1 Reply

preetpatel94

Divorce, adoption, and other matters controlled by the state government are examples of:

Divorce, adoption, and other matters controlled by the state government are examples of:

Divorce, adoption, and other matters controlled by the state government are examples of:
 a. matters over which state courts have ultimate jurisdiction
  b. matters over which federal courts have relative jurisdiction c. matters over which

ahlea1   49   1 Reply

kadodd

Divorce, adoption, and other matters controlled by the state government are examples of:

Divorce, adoption, and other matters controlled by the state government are examples of:

Divorce, adoption, and other matters controlled by the state government are examples of:
 a. matters over which state courts have ultimate jurisdiction b. matters over which state courts have exclusive jurisdiction c. matters over which state c

Blizzen   72   2 Replies

Blizzen

If either state courts or federal courts have the power to hear a dispute this is known as:

If either state courts or federal courts have the power to hear a dispute this is known as:

If either state courts or federal courts have the power to hear a dispute this is known as:
 a. concurrent jurisdiction
  b. simultaneous jurisdiction c. alternate jurisdiction
  d. removal jurisdiction
  e. none of the other cho

belleej   38   1 Reply

takirahh_

If either state courts or federal courts have the power to hear a dispute this is known as:

If either state courts or federal courts have the power to hear a dispute this is known as:

If either state courts or federal courts have the power to hear a dispute this is known as:
 a. simultaneous jurisdiction b. alternate jurisdiction
  c. removal jurisdiction d. equitable jurisdiction
  e. none of the other choices are

abunting   47   1 Reply

whitneyracquel

Concurrent jurisdiction is when the:

Concurrent jurisdiction is when the:

Concurrent jurisdiction is when the:
 a. state trial and appeals courts both have jurisdiction b. court had jurisdiction over people and property
  c. court has jurisdiction over non-citizens
  d. court has jurisdiction over a foreign

stewartt08   40   1 Reply

snp21

State courts often have jurisdiction to hear federal question cases. An exception to this rule ...

State courts often have jurisdiction to hear federal question cases. An exception to this rule ...

State courts often have jurisdiction to hear federal question cases. An exception to this rule exists when the:
 a. state court involved has a conflict of interest
  b. state court has a history of deciding federal questions cases against

richardsmither7   48   1 Reply

m7md9078

State courts often have jurisdiction to hear federal question cases. An exception to this rule ...

State courts often have jurisdiction to hear federal question cases. An exception to this rule ...

State courts often have jurisdiction to hear federal question cases. An exception to this rule exists when the:
 a. Supreme Court determines that the state courts are not capable of handling the complexity of a particular federal question

dudenp22   42   1 Reply

zoechunn

A plaintiff files suit in state court. The defendant wants the case tried in federal court. Both ...

A plaintiff files suit in state court. The defendant wants the case tried in federal court. Both ...

A plaintiff files suit in state court. The defendant wants the case tried in federal court. Both courts can properly hear the case. If the case goes to federal court it is based on:
 a. exclusive jurisdiction
  b. simultaneous jurisdiction

mandyns   59   1 Reply

al

Right of removal is intended to:

Right of removal is intended to:

Right of removal is intended to:
 a. protect out-of-state plaintiffs from state courts that might favor their own citizens
  b. protect out-of-state defendants from being disadvantaged by not understanding the state court system c. protect

nespinal   21   2 Replies

nespinal

A defendant may not remove a case to federal court if:

A defendant may not remove a case to federal court if:

A defendant may not remove a case to federal court if:
 a. the plaintiff is not a citizen of the United States
  b. the defendant files suit in the plaintiff's home state court, rather than the defendant's home state court c. the defendant

s08203010   35   1 Reply

alarose

Parties to a suit may prefer state or federal court because:

Parties to a suit may prefer state or federal court because:

Parties to a suit may prefer state or federal court because:
 a. the law may be more favorable in one court
  b. the procedure may be more favorable in one court c. the judge may be more favorable in one court
  d. local politics may

Ptelwa   29   1 Reply

breoh

In Erie Railroad Co v. Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit ...

In Erie Railroad Co v. Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit ...

In Erie Railroad Co v. Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit him in Pennsylvania:
 a. the U.S. Supreme Court said that state common law must be applied in federal court
  b. the U.S. Supreme Court sai

belleej   39   1 Reply

trxozandeniz

In Erie Railroad Co v. Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit ...

In Erie Railroad Co v. Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit ...

In Erie Railroad Co v. Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit him in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court reversed the decision for Tompkins by the court of appeals because it held that:
 a. applying the doctrin

Blizzen   29   1 Reply

kmoralesss