× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
o
5
4
m
4
b
4
x
4
a
4
l
4
t
4
S
4
m
3
s
3
New Topic  
huck4 huck4
wrote...
Posts: 644
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Saadala v. East Brunswick Zoning Board of Adjustment, where Saalada sued the Zoning Board after it approved a 7-Eleven's application to extend its non-conforming classification so it could expand its business, the appeals court held that:
 a. the Board should not have granted the application because 7-Eleven failed to show special reasons required for approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan
  b. the Board should have granted the application because 7-Eleven showed the special reasons required for approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan
  c. the Board should have granted the application because 7-Eleven failed to show special reasons required for approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan
  d. the Board should not have granted the application because 7-Eleven is too small a corporation to have thespecial reasons to get approval of a use variance for its redevelopment plan e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 42 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
sweetpeajezzysweetpeajezzy
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1115
Rep: 6 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

huck4 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
wrote...

Yesterday
Brilliant
wrote...

2 hours ago
Helped a lot
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  898 People Browsing
 112 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 185
  
 251
  
 700
Your Opinion