× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
o
5
4
m
4
b
4
x
4
a
4
l
4
t
4
S
4
m
3
s
3
New Topic  
Mimicri Mimicri
wrote...
Posts: 602
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid the export of natural minnows, to help protect the state's natural resources. When this law was challenged, the Supreme Court held:
 a. Oklahoma has a paramount interest in preserving its natural resources, so the law stands b. Oklahoma has no interest in preserving minnows, so the law fails
  c. Oklahoma was improperly taking property without compensation
  d. regulation of fish falls under the Fish and Wildlife Service, so Oklahoma preempted a federal law e. Oklahoma was using a discriminatory method to achieve its conservation goals
Read 104 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
acuda5acuda5
wrote...
Posts: 218
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Mimicri Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Brilliant
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  886 People Browsing
 116 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 33
  
 383
  
 303
Your Opinion
Where do you get your textbooks?
Votes: 284