× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business
New Topic  
Mimicri Mimicri
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 602
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid the export of natural minnows, to help protect the state's natural resources. When this law was challenged, the Supreme Court held:
 a. Oklahoma has a paramount interest in preserving its natural resources, so the law stands b. Oklahoma has no interest in preserving minnows, so the law fails
  c. Oklahoma was improperly taking property without compensation
  d. regulation of fish falls under the Fish and Wildlife Service, so Oklahoma preempted a federal law e. Oklahoma was using a discriminatory method to achieve its conservation goals
Read 107 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
acuda5acuda5
wrote...
#1
Posts: 218
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Mimicri Author
wrote...

6 years ago
this is exactly what I needed
kater28
wrote...

Yesterday
This calls for a celebration Person Raising Both Hands in Celebration
jaray75
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks for your help!!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  955 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 279
  
 366
  
 557
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 431
Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?