× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
g
3
3
2
J
2
p
2
m
2
h
2
s
2
r
2
d
2
l
2
a
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
isinc231 isinc231
wrote...
Go to Answer
6 years ago
In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid the export of natural minnows, to help protect the state's natural resources. When this law was challenged, the Supreme Court announced a test of constitutionality that did not include which provision:
 a. whether another rule could be used to achieve the same purpose without discriminating against interstate commerce
  b. whether another rule would have a more beneficial impact on the state
  c. whether the rule was evenhanded with only incidental effects on interstate commerce d. whether the rule serves a legitimate local interest
  e. all of the other choices were part of the rule announced
Read 73 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
boopboop
wrote...
#1
Posts: 203
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

jblazah
wrote...

6 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
jaray75
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
hmonier
wrote...

2 hours ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  780 People Browsing
 111 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 553
  
 29
  
 690