× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
g
3
3
2
J
2
p
2
m
2
h
2
s
2
r
2
d
2
l
2
a
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
may129 may129
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 624
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid the export of natural minnows, to help protect the state's natural resources. When this law was challenged, the Supreme Court held:
 a. Oklahoma has a paramount interest in preserving its natural resources, so the law stands b. Oklahoma has no interest in preserving minnows, so the law fails
  c. Oklahoma violated the constitution by impermissibly burdening interstate commerce
  d. regulation of fish falls under the Fish and Wildlife Service, so Oklahoma preempted a federal law e. none of the other choices
Read 43 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
vbassvbass
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1133
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

may129 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
lolaww
wrote...

Yesterday
Good timing, thanks!
shangshang
wrote...

2 hours ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1158 People Browsing
 139 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 40
  
 1380
  
 931
Your Opinion
Previous poll results: How often do you eat-out per week?