× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business
New Topic  
Blizzen Blizzen
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 634
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Erie Railroad Co v. Tompkins, where Tompkins sued a New York company that owned a train that hit him in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court reversed the decision for Tompkins by the court of appeals because it held that:
 a. applying the doctrine of Swift v. Tyson rendered impossible equal protection of the law
  b. applying the doctrine of Swift v. Tyson rendered impossible avoidance of the in rem problem c. applying the doctrine of Swift v. Tyson created a substantial party problem
  d. applying the doctrine of Swift v. Tyson created a diversity of citizenship problem e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 28 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
kmoralessskmoralesss
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1086
Rep: 4 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Blizzen Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
DAGINC
wrote...

Yesterday
This site is awesome
Jadakiss
wrote...

2 hours ago
Smart ... Thanks!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  951 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 189
  
 158
  
 372
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 3
Closes: November 4
Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?