× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
g
3
3
2
J
2
p
2
m
2
h
2
s
2
r
2
d
2
l
2
a
2
New Topic  
ac22888 ac22888
wrote...
Posts: 328
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
The Jarvis family owned its land for more than 150 years. The Jarvis family traditionally farmed the land and for that purpose maintained farm animals. As years passed, most of the surrounding farms were sold by the owners and the area turned out to be a close-in suburb of a major city. A zoning ordinance was passed that prohibited maintaining a barn or farmyard animals on the land. The Jarvis family was advised that they were unaffected by this ordinance because theirs would be considered a nonconforming use. The members of the Jarvis family lost interest in farming and sold off all their animals. Seven (7 ) years later, a family member desired to raise a few pigs on the property. Angry neighbors asserted that the family has lost the right to do so. What is your opinion?
Read 62 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
Although the Jarvis family originally had the right to maintain animals on the premises, it appears that the nonconforming use was discontinued. This discontinuance for a period of seven (7 ) years probably constituted an abandonment. The likelihood is that the Jarvis family no longer has the right to raise pigs on the property.
ac22888 Author
wrote...
6 years ago
White Heavy Checkmark
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1152 People Browsing
 116 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 290
  
 81
  
 50
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 431