× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
n
6
t
5
k
4
j
4
d
4
d
4
t
4
a
4
d
4
m
4
d
4
p
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
vincent_pijen vincent_pijen
wrote...
Posts: 731
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Illinois v. Wardlow (2000), the U.S. Supreme Court held that presence in a high-crime area, combined with unprovoked flight upon observing police officers, gives officers sufficient grounds to investigate to further determine if criminal activity is about to take place. What remains unclear about the Wardlow rule? Do you agree or disagree with the majority in Wardlow? Explain your position.
 
  What will be an ideal response?
Read 51 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
#1
6 years ago
Two issues remain unclear about the Wardlow rule: (1) what is a high-crime area,
and (2) how do you determine that flight from police officers is unprovoked? I agree
with the majority because it allows police officers to use their training and
experience in determining how to respond to unusual activity.
vincent_pijen Author
wrote...
#2
6 years ago
Thank you so very much, was really helpful and kind of you to answer
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1449 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 864
  
 380
  
 330
Your Opinion
What's your favorite coffee beverage?
Votes: 303
Previous poll results: Do you trust social media networks with protecting your privacy?