× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
T
3
s
3
o
3
G
3
k
3
C
3
a
3
K
3
f
3
j
3
b
3
c
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
stu.nehagupta stu.nehagupta
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 737
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
According to the Supreme Court in Katz v. U.S., involving an electronic listening and recording device attached to the outside of a public telephone booth:
 
  a. the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places.
  b. a subjective expectation of privacy confers the Fourth Amendment's protection.
  c. there is no search unless there has been a physical intrusion into a place.
  d. eavesdropping on a public phone booth is not a search.
Read 25 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
itsbouttimitsbouttim
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 932
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

stu.nehagupta Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Brilliant ツ
Gamiung3657
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
kaytee23
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  923 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 262
  
 339
  
 334
Your Opinion
Who's your favorite biologist?
Votes: 608
Previous poll results: Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?