Providing federal funds to sectarian schools for purchase of instructional and educational materials does not violate the Establishment Clause.
Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).
[Ques. 2] Payment of Title I teachers in Catholic schools does not violate the Establishment Clause.
Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).
[Ques. 3] The Supreme Courts decision in
Zobrest upheld public funding of special education services in Catholic schools.
Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).
[Ques. 4] The Establishment Clause has been rendered largely inoperable by U.S. Supreme Court decisions in
Agostini,
Helms, and
Zelman.
Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).
[Ques. 5] Tax credits and deductions benefiting religious schools are unconstitutional. (see
Mueller v. Allen)
Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).
[Ques. 6] States that do not provide public funds for transportation of children to parochial schools are in violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).
[Ques. 7] The
Everson case in 1947 espoused a strong separation philosophy and struck down public funding to transport school children to parochial schools.
Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).
[Ques. 8] The U.S. Supreme Court decisions in
Agostini,
Helms, and
Zelman now permit public tax funds via vouchers to flow to Catholic and other religious schools.
Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).
[Ques. 9] Catholic clergy sought to gain public funding for a Catholic Public School System in New York in the 1840s.
Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).
[Ques. 10] Conservative Protestant ministers fought against free public schools in America.
Indicate whether the statement is true(T) or false(F).
Quick Reply
