× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
New Topic  
jojo13 jojo13
wrote...
6 years ago
Joseph is a physician. His state's licensing agency has received a large number of complaints about him, and recently two of his patients have mysteriously died while under his care. The licensing agency revokes his license to practice medicine in a summary proceeding without a hearing.
 
  a. Summary protective actions are always per se violative of equal protection.
  b. Summary protective actions are always per se violative of due process.
  c. Summary protective actions are not per se violative of equal protection if an immediate post-action hearing is conducted.
  d. Summary protective actions are not per se violative of due process if an immediate post-action hearing is conducted.

Q. 2

What case allowed Congress to regulate the drinking age within the states using the Tax and Spending Clause of Article I?
 
  A) South Dakota v. Dole
  B) U.S. v. Lopez
  C) Pollock v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co
  D) McCulloch v. Maryland

Q. 3

Ben's landlord has brought a legal action against him to remove Ben from his apartment for allegedly breaching the lease agreement. This formal legal proceeding is known as:
 
  A. Self-help
   B. Eviction
   C. Reversion
   D. Adverse possession

Q. 4

Even if a discrimination case is not governed under the Equal Protection Clause, the provisions of federal, state, or local civil rights legislation may apply to preclude the identified form of discrimination.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Q. 5

In which of the following cases did the court state the courts retain the authority to check agency policymaking for procedural compliance and for arbitrariness. But the courts cannot properly reexamine the wisdom of an agency-promulgated policy?
 
  a. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
  b. Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.
  c. Gonzalez v. Reno
  d. General Motors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Q. 6

Since 1934, the U.S. Supreme Court generally has interpreted the Contract Clause in a manner that allows government to enact legislation that benefits the general welfare even if it interferes with private contracts.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Read 574 times
4 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
LarryLarry
wrote...
Posts: 341
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

jojo13 Author
wrote...
6 years ago
So very smart
wrote...
6 years ago
IQ 110 ha ha Just kidding, thanks for the compliment!
wrote...
3 years ago
ty helped
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  890 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 285
  
 1760
  
 470
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 3
Closes: November 4

Previous poll results: What's your favorite coffee beverage?