× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
o
5
4
m
4
b
4
x
4
a
4
l
4
t
4
S
4
m
3
s
3
New Topic  
ttardalo ttardalo
wrote...
Posts: 337
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Which of the following is supported by research findings regarding the effectiveness of ability grouping for science and math instruction?
 
  a. Between-class grouping seems to be effective for math but not for science.
  b. The Joplin Plan seems to be ineffective for both subject areas. c. Within-class grouping and the Joplin Plan seem to be effective. d. Regrouping is ineffective for science and math.

Ques. 2

Theoretical adequacy may be enhanced by
 
  a. extended fieldwork. c. pattern matching.
  b. interdisciplinary triangulation. d. All of these are true.

Ques. 3

The research findings on ability grouping discussed in the text suggest that
 
  a. between-class ability grouping is most beneficial to low-achieving students.
  b. within-class ability grouping is not effective for the primary and elementary grades.
  c. there is no empirical support for between-class ability grouping.
  d. between-class ability grouping works in conjunction with the Joplin Plan.

Ques. 4

Strategies for demonstrating corroboration in qualitative studies include
 
  a. data triangulation.
  b. methods triangulation.
  c. interdisciplinary triangulation.
  d. a and b
  e. b and c
Read 31 times
2 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
kimahnsekimahnse
wrote...
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

ttardalo Author
wrote...
6 years ago
White Heavy Checkmark Correct!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  614 People Browsing
 114 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 464
  
 707
  
 370
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 387