Top Posters
Since Sunday
14
14
12
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
9
9
New Topic  
wrote...
Posts: 187
A month ago
Joey offers to sell Melissa the latest version of a popular gaming system for only $25 cash, although in the store it generally costs over $200. The deal seems too good to be true, and Melissa assumes that the gaming system is stolen. If Melissa purchases the item, is she guilty of receiving stolen property? What if Joey tells Melissa that the gaming system "fell off the back of a truck"? Does that change Melissa's potential liability? Why or why not?
Textbook 
Criminal Law (Justice Series)
Edition: 2nd
Authors:
Read 137 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
wrote...
Posts: 206
A month ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything.
It is a crime for a person to receive stolen property, even if that person did not actually steal the property. Most states do not require proof that the defendant knew the property was stolen. Knowledge is often inferred, but some states, such as Texas, require proof that the defendant knew the property was stolen. It would depend on the state whether or not she can be held liable. Finally, the crime of receiving stolen property is usually treated as a misdemeanor.
1
Related Topics
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers.
Learn More
Improve Grades
Help Others
Save Time
Accessible 24/7
  79 People Browsing
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 182

Related Images
 108
 111
 89