Top Posters
Since Sunday
g
3
3
2
J
2
p
2
m
2
h
2
s
2
r
2
d
2
l
2
a
2
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Sociology
New Topic  
toripollard8 toripollard8
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 486
Rep: 13 0
4 years ago
In 2003, the Supreme Court ruled in 2 cases, Gratz v Bollinger and Grutter v Bollinger that:

▸ Only gender and age could be used for preferential admission.

▸ Preference could not be based on race or ethnicity.

▸ Promoting racial diversity in educational settings was legitimate.

▸ Gender could not be used as admission criteria.
Textbook 
Social Welfare: A History of the American Response to Need

Social Welfare: A History of the American Response to Need


Edition: 9th
Authors:
Read 99 times
2 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
BakariBakari
wrote...
#1
Posts: 371
Rep: 56 0
4 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

toripollard8 Author
wrote...
#2
4 years ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1139 People Browsing
 117 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 332
  
 861
  
 4423
Your Opinion
How often do you eat-out per week?
Votes: 79
Previous poll results: Does a gender wage gap exist in America?