Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
New Topic  
Jeff Stein Jeff Stein
wrote...
Posts: 87
Rep: 0 0
2 years ago
An Ontario provincial court judge was forced to decide a case based on conflicting legal precedents from higher courts. One of the precedents had been set by the Ontario Court of Appeal. The other precedent had been set by the Alberta Court of Appeal. The Ontario provincial court judge elected to follow the Alberta Court of Appeal precedent. In these circumstances, the decision of the Ontario provincial court judge will likely be:

▸ stayed due to conflict of interest.

▸ upheld on appeal because the judge clearly followed an existing precedent.

▸ overturned on appeal because the judge failed to properly distinguish the cases before her.

▸ overturned on appeal because an inferior provincial court must follow the decision of a higher court within the province if faced with conflicting precedents elsewhere.

▸ upheld on appeal because stare decisis only requires that a judge follow an earlier decision.
Textbook 
Legal Fundamentals for Canadian Business

Legal Fundamentals for Canadian Business


Edition: 4th
Author:
Read 98 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
Ivansitospeed@gIvansitospeed@g
wrote...
Posts: 76
Rep: 0 0
2 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

Jeff Stein Author
wrote...

2 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
wrote...

Yesterday
Helped a lot
wrote...

2 hours ago
Smart ... Thanks!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1322 People Browsing
 122 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 277
  
 90
  
 51
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 370